Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Dunbar v. Ianuzzi
as 25-1486
Plaintiff:
JANIS LAVERN DUNBAR
Defendant:
MICHAEL IANNUZZI, SR., RICHARD TURNER, MARCELLA TURNER and others
Dunbar v. Ianuzzi et al
as 3:2024cv01358
Defendant:
Michael Sr. Ianuzzi, Vivvian Coleman, Queen Dunbar and others
Plaintiff:
Janis Lavern Dunbar
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Contreras v. Wilson et al
as 4:2022cv04102
Plaintiff:
Adam Contreras
Defendant:
David Wilson, Melissa Wilson, Fox 26 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Contreras v. Wilson et al
as 4:2022cv04015
Plaintiff:
Adam Contreras
Defendant:
David Wilson, Melissa Wilson, Fox News 26 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
United States of America v. Cunningham (Brooks)
as 17-2172
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Timothy Cunningham, AKA New York and Leshone Gray, AKA Twin
Defendant - Appellant:
Darrell Brooks
United States of America v. Cunningham (Brooks)
as 17-2172
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Timothy Cunningham, AKA New York and Leshone Gray, AKA Twin
Defendant / Appellant:
Darrell Brooks
Darrell Brooks v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 15-20244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Successor by Merger to Chase Home Finance, L.L.C.
Brooks v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
as 4:2015cv00472
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
Plaintiff:
Brooks and Darrell Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Darrell Brooks v. Lloyd Shope
as 10-1763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL BROOKS
Defendant / Appellee:
LLOYD LAYMAN SHOPE, ENTERPRISE CAR RENTAL, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Darrell Brooks v. Lloyd Shope
as 10-1763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
LLOYD LAYMAN SHOPE, ENTERPRISE CAR RENTAL, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
