Cases 21 - 30 of 1,102
Ducote v. Vannoy
as 1:2022cv06052
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Ducote
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Vannoy
as 2:2022cv03186
Plaintiff:
Virgil Smith
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LaVergne v. Stutes
as 22-30475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brandon S. LaVergne
Defendant / Appellee:
Keith Stutes, District Attorney Louisiana 15th Judicial District Court, Michael Harson, Former District Attorney Louisiana 15th Judicial District Court, Herman Clause, Former District Court Judge Louisiana 15th Judicial District Court and others
Demery v. Hooper
as 22-30467
Petitioner / Appellant:
Andre Demery
Respondent / Appellee:
Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Oby v. John Doe
as 5:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Sherman Oby
Defendant:
John Doe, Captain J. Green, R. Logan and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Passman v. LeBlanc
as 22-30486
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua Passman
Defendant / Appellee:
James LeBlanc, Tara Graffia, Vincent Knight and others
Neal v. Vannoy
as 22-70007
Petitioner:
Jarrell Neal
Respondent:
Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Peyton v. Vannoy et al
as 5:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Peyton
Defendant:
Warden Darrel Vannoy, Kandi Vannorman, K. Sewell and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cartwright v. Vannoy
as 3:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
John Cartwright
Defendant:
Darrel Vannoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. Vannoy
as 2:2022cv01652
Plaintiff:
Eric Ross
Defendant:
Darrell Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
