Cases 11 - 20 of 22
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2016cv00229
Defendant:
Lakewood City of , David Butts and John Doe Estes
Plaintiff:
Renata Lynn Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DOBSON v. FOWLKES et al
as 5:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOBSON
Defendant:
JOSEPH FOWLKES, DAVID BUTTS and SHEVONDAH FIELDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chad Bubrick v. Hays SP Warden, et al
as 12-12852
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAD M BUBRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
HAYS SP WARDEN, CARL LIFT, DAVID BUTTS and others
Chad Bubrick v. Hancock SP Warden, et al
as 11-11345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAD M BUBRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
HANCOCK SP WARDEN, CARL LIFT, DAVID BUTTS and others
Butt v. Hartley, et al
as 10-1062
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID BUTT
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVE HARTLEY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Burgess v. City of Lakewood et al
as 3:2009cv05584
Plaintiff:
Darren Burgess
Defendant:
City of Lakewood, Lakewood Police Department, Ryan Moody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnold v. Adams et al
as 5:2009cv00322
Plaintiff:
Rashad Arnold
Defendant:
Alan Adams, David Larry Fraizier, Fred Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bubrick v. Frazier et al
as 5:2009cv00013
Plaintiff:
Chad M Bubrick
Defendant:
David Frazier, Carl Lift and David Butts
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bell et al v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv03237
Plaintiff:
James W. Bell, Pat A. Bell, Herschel Bissent and others
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Butt v. Hartley et al
as 1:2007cv01681
Petitioner:
David Butt
Respondent:
Steve Hartley and Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
