Cases 1 - 9 of 9
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woodley Sr. v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Defendant:
David C Young, Evan Poole, Toure' McCord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Franklin County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Tasha Chapman
Defendant:
Franklin County Board of Commissioners, Commissioner John O'Grady, Kevin L Boyce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. House et al
as 4:2022cv04162
Plaintiff:
David C Young
Defendant:
Heather House, Sarah Hartman, Angela Caudill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
M.G., et al v. Young, et al
as 15-2090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M.G., L.J., F.C. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID C. YOUNG, ROBERT T. SMITH, JOSEPH R. HUDSON and others
M.G. et al v. Young et al
as 1:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
M.G. , L.J. and F.C.
Defendant:
David C Young, Robert T Smith, Joseph R Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
P.M. et al v. Young et al
as 1:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
P.M., P.M., P.M. and others
Defendant:
David C. Young, Robert T. Smith, Joseph R. Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
