Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Brooks v. Henry et al
as 1:2023cv21192
Plaintiff:
Sobers Brooks
Defendant:
Renita Henry, Emily Phillips, Deborah Nabat Frankel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23748
Plaintiff:
DAVID C MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv22214
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID C MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv04172
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv07555
Plaintiff:
David C. Miller
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as MN/0:15-cv-01341
Plaintiff:
David C Miller
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Miller v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv01341
Plaintiff:
David C Miller
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kaufman, Jr. v. Miller
as 13-5020
Petitioner - Appellant:
JACK KAUFMAN, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID C. MILLER, Warden
Whitmore v. Miller
as 12-6191
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID ROBIN WHITMORE
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID C MILLER
Pate et al v. Huntington National Bank et al
as 5:2012cv01044
Plaintiff:
Margaret R. Fetter, Jerome J. Pate, John Vargo and others
Defendant:
Huntington National Bank, FirstMerit Bank, N.A., John Doe Banks 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
