Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Ashley v. Moore, et al.
as 24-1109
Plaintiff:
G. ASHLEY
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, JUSTIN PETERS, Officer, No. 37708, EDGAR MURO, Officer, No. 36863 and others
Ellison v. Christensen
as 24-463
Petitioner:
ZONTA ELLISON
Respondent:
Warden DAVID CHRISTENSEN, Ray Brook
Wright v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2023cv01326
Plaintiff:
Matt Wright
Defendant:
State of Washington, Washington State Department of Corrections, Christine Gomes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Wilton v. Haynes et al
as 3:2023cv05721
Plaintiff:
Reginald Wayne Wilton
Defendant:
Ronald Haynes, Sara Kariko, Scott Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Magluta v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2023cv01261
Petitioner:
Salvador Magluta
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and David Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perry v. Christensen
as 9:2022cv01161
Petitioner:
Damien Perry
Respondent:
David Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
G. Ashley v. Michael Rey Moore et al
as 2:2022cv04909
Plaintiff:
G. Ashley
Defendant:
Michel Rey Moore, Eric Michael Garcetti, Gilbert Cedillo and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Cynthia Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrews v. Christensen
as 22-136
Petitioner / Appellant:
Sylvester Andrews
Respondent / Appellee:
David Christensen
Padilla-Ayala v. Christensen
as 9:2021cv01332
Petitioner:
Orlando Padilla-Ayala
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General, Director of U.S. Bureau of Prisons and David Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Andrews v. Christensen
as 9:2021cv01270
Petitioner:
Sylvester Andrews
Respondent:
David Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
