Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Alana Phillips v. Carlos Rocha, et al
as 23-3139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alana S. Phillips
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Carlos Rocha, Mena Regional Health System Hospital Commission Member, Michael Myers, Mena Regional Health System Hospital Commission Member, Leon Philpot, Mena Regional Health System Hospital Commission Member and others
Phillips v. Rocha et al
as 2:2022cv02181
Plaintiff:
Alana S. Phillips
Defendant:
Dr. Carlos Rocha, Michael Myers, Leon Philpot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Howland v. Darlington et al
as 1:2017cv00903
Plaintiff:
Kiel Howland
Defendant:
Nicholas Darlington, Heather Lass and David Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Brown v. Gilbert et al
as 1:2016cv00260
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Brown, Jr
Defendant:
David Gilbert, Penny K Hix, Jess Alumbaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Sessoms et al
as 1:2014cv00320
Plaintiff:
Toney Ford, Sr
Defendant:
Derek Sessoms, David Gilbert, James Loftin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roby v. Gilbert et al
as 3:2013cv01154
Plaintiff:
Jerome Roby
Defendant:
David Gilbert, Mark Stefanatos and Jay D Kay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roby v. Himelick et al
as 3:2013cv01081
Plaintiff:
Jerome Roby
Defendant:
Darrell Himelick, David Gilbert, Todd Fleece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vinson v. Gilbert et al
as 1:2013cv00156
Plaintiff:
Dalvon Vinson
Defendant:
David Gilbert, Jay D Kay, Delmiro Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
