Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P. v. ADAMS et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P.
Defendant:
J. MICHAEL ADAMS, JR., Richard W. Bloomingdale, AMY BRADLEY and others
Alan v. IRS et al
as 6:2024cv06076
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
IRS, U.S. Atty. David J. Hickton, Assist. U.S. Atty. Paul E. Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jack Allen v. USA, et al
as 17-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK E. ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SOLICITOR GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Eric Ewell v. DOJ, et al
as 16-5044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eric Ewell
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Criminal Division, United States Department of Justice Office of Information Policy, Drug Enforcement Administration and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-3989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
RAY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2014cv00471
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS WILLIAM RAY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID J. HICKTON, CHARLES A. EBERLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00031
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Akhi Muhammad v. Gregory Weis, et al
as 11-1075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AKHI R. MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY T. WEIS, W. ARCH IRVIN, JR., BERNARD J. MCAULEY and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Akhi Muhammad v. Gregory Weis, et al
as 09-4311
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AKHI R. MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
W. ARCH IRVIN, JR., BERNARD J. MCAULEY, FRANK M. GIANOLA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
