Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Davis v. Collier et al
as 6:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
David J. Davis
Defendant:
Brian Collier, C.F. Hazzlewood, Karen Acosta and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00496
Petitioner:
David J. Davis, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 6:2023cv00497
Petitioner:
David J. Davis, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marcus Thorpe v. Derrick Copeland
as 23-6333
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS A. THORPE
Defendant / Appellee:
DERRICK COPELAND, f/k/a John Does 1-5, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, f/k/a John Does 1-5 and others
Defendant:
ANITA GOWANS, f/k/a A. Gowans, Nurse, Alexander CI, JOHN DOES, Correctional Officers 1-5, JOHN DOE, Medical Doctor and others
MURPHY v. DAVIS
as 5:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
DARRELL LEON MURPHY, SR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID J DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Davis
as 1:2022cv02712
Plaintiff:
Darrell Leon Murphy, Sr.
Defendant:
David J. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45360
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Anda, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Earl v. Howard et al
as 1:2017cv00243
Plaintiff:
Clyde Earl
Defendant:
Jonathan J. Howard , Steve Paschos , Tushar Advani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Mennella et al
as 1:2015cv10356
Plaintiff:
Verna L Johnson
Defendant:
Concetta Mennella, Ulysses Johnson, Julie Ratliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ambrosino et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2011cv01319
Plaintiff:
John Ambrosino , Angela Ashworth , Bernard Butterfield and others
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
