Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv00630
Petitioner:
Jimmy David Mills
Respondent:
Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
MILLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13829
Plaintiff:
DAVID MILLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mills v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03151
Plaintiff:
David Mills
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MILLS v 3M COMPANYet al
as 3:2023cv23803
Defendant:
DAVID MILLS, 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
David Mills v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03669
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
David Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mills v. City of Palo Alto et al
as 4:2023cv03330
Plaintiff:
Eric David Mills
Defendant:
City of Palo Alto, Officer E. Gonzales, Officer Daniel Cuevas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63782
Plaintiff:
DAVID MILLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52338
Plaintiff:
DAVID MILLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.