Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Neal et al v. The Hanover Insurance Company
as 3:2026cv01168
Plaintiff:
David Neal and Jennifer Neal
Defendant:
The Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00721
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00075
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Taylor et al v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2026cv00006
Plaintiff:
David A Taylor and Kristina Udall
Defendant:
State of Washington, Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Eric Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv03308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv11540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv04256
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv03080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
RINEY v. BISIGNANO
as 4:2025cv00213
Plaintiff:
DAVID NEAL RINEY
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Neal et al v. Propymax LLC
as 1:2025cv00776
Plaintiff:
Cathy Chan and David Neal
Defendant:
Propymax LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
