Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Perry v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
David Perry
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews et al v. Guest Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00910
Plaintiff:
Robert Matthews, Lawrence Jackson, Jeffrey Johnson and others
Defendant:
Guest Services, Inc., Guest Services, Inc. Termination Pay Plan, Gerard Gabrys and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Perry v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
David Perry
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton v. Groh et al
as 5:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Clinton
Defendant:
Gina M. Groh, Robert W. Trumble, Anna Krasinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodie v. CONSOL Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00004
Plaintiff:
David Perry Goodie
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston and CONSOL Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Perry v. Richmond City Jail
as 3:2018cv00330
Plaintiff:
David Perry
Defendant:
Richmond City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv25859
Plaintiff:
Karen Perry and David Perry
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2013cv19069
Plaintiff:
Karen I. Perry and David Perry
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wells v. SCDF Employees et al
as 8:2010cv03111
Plaintiff:
Ray Edward Wells
Defendant:
SCDF Employees, Larry W Powers, Sargent Woodford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. SCDF Employees et al
as 2:2010cv03111
Plaintiff:
Ray Edward Wells
Defendant:
SCDF Employees, Larry W Powers, Sargent Woodford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
