Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Purcell v. Miller
as 2:2023cv01658
Petitioner:
Christopher David Purcell
Respondent:
Jaimie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Purcell v. Mills et al
as 3:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Purcell
Defendant:
Mills, Peter Druckenmiller, Simon Whang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Purcell v. Scient Federal Credit Union Split Dollar Agreement Plan et al
as 3:2022cv00961
Plaintiff:
David Purcell
Defendant:
Scient Federal Credit Union Split Dollar Agreement Plan and Scient Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Purcell et al v. Liberty Insurance Corporation
as 3:2021cv00308
Defendant:
Liberty Insurance Corporation
Plaintiff:
David Purcell and Laura Purcell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PURCELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv45008
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHANE DAVID PURCELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PURCELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv26976
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD DAVID PURCELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEFF v. PKS HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv01826
Plaintiff:
TONI CAIAZZO NEFF
Defendant:
PKS HOLDINGS, LLC, PURSHE KAPLAN STERLING INVESTMENTS, INC., MHC SECURITIES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bottone et al v. Bridgeport et al
as 3:2009cv00797
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bottone, Mathew Deysenroth, Robert Diaz and others
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport, Bridgeport Civ Svc Comm and Ralph Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bottone et al v. Bridgeport et al
as 3:2008cv01320
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bottone, Timothy Bottone, Timothy Bottone and others
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport, Bridgeport Civ Svc Comm and Ralph Jacobs
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
