Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Rogers v. McDowell County Commission et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00074
Plaintiff: Justin David Rogers
Defendant: McDowell County Commission, Correctional Officer Green and Correctional Officer Culbertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dull v. Wright
as 1:2016cv00938
Petitioner: David Roger Dull
Respondent: Edward Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI v. SLUSSER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00712
Plaintiff: SAINT DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW PROPHET PASTOR RABBI
Defendant: SCOTT T. SLUSSER, SEAN PERRIN, ADRIAN W. DELLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. PIEDMONT CI ADMINISTRATION AND MEDICAL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00668
Plaintiff: PROPHET PREACHER PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant: PIEDMONT CI ADMINISTRATION AND MEDICAL, TABOR CITY CI ADMINISTRATION AND MEDICAL, PENDER CI ADMINISTRATION AND MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2014cv00578
Plaintiff: PROPHET PREACHER PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant: ROGER JAMES DAVIS, BRUSE BURGER, CHARLES VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dyke v. Abernathy et al
as 5:2014ct03124
Plaintiff: Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant: Wayne Abernathy, Kent W. Brown, David Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Hill v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-7108
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID ROGERS HILL
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN
Hill v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2012cv00520
Petitioner: David Roger Hill
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?