Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Ross v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv04927
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROSS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, JOHN and JANE DOES and City Of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Sarah Weiss
as 22-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, JOHN MEADORS, BARNEY GIESE, all three individually for damages arising from malicious prosecution and for qui tam recovery and others
(PC) Ross v. Chau, et al.
as 1:2020cv01000
Plaintiff:
David Ross
Defendant:
James Chau, Steven Smith, California Correctional Health Care Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Kelly
as 4:2019cv00918
Plaintiff:
David Ross Brooks
Defendant:
Michael Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Kelly
as 6:2019cv00599
Plaintiff:
David Ross Brooks
Defendant:
Michael Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kreis v. Ross et al
as 3:2017cv00344
Plaintiff:
August B. Kreis, III
Defendant:
David Ross, David Johnson, Van Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Sara Weiss
as 15-2458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, JOHN MEADORS, BARNEY GIESE, all three individually for damages arising from malicious prosecution and for qui tam recovery and others
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Weiss et al
as 3:2015cv03186
Plaintiff:
Marie Therese H Assa'ad-Faltas
Defendant:
Sarah Heather Savitz Weiss, John Meadors, Barney Giese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Ross et al
as 3:2014cv00450
Plaintiff:
Brian L. Walton, Sr.
Defendant:
David Ross, Whonda Johnson Ross and Blake Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Ross v. Antonio Hightower, et al
as 13-20408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTONIO K. HIGHTOWER, GAIL D. WHITFIELD, C. S. DAIGLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
