Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
THOMPSON v. VAN NESS et al
as 3:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
JOEL DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER VAN NESS, LEE BRODOWSKI, ROB ORR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. BARAKA et al
as 2:2023cv04209
Defendant:
RAS J. BARAKA, RAS A. BARAKA, JABRIL PAUL and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL DAVID THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Todd Parkin v. Tony Baldwin
as 22-2303
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD LYNN PARKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. TONY BALDWIN, Superintendent of the Buncombe County School District (BCS), DAVID THOMPSON, BCS Director of Student Services and 504 Coordinator, CONNIE DENNING, IEP team member, BCS Assistant EC (Exceptional Children's) Director and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11887
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination
Cohen v. Hill et al
as 2:2021cv01361
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Cohen, Jr
Defendant:
Willie Hill, Major Cleveland Moore, David Agee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parkin v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2021cv00261
Plaintiff:
Todd Lynn Parkins and Todd Lynn Parkin
Defendant:
Tony Baldwin, David Thompson, Connie Denning and others
Petitioner:
Cynthia Moses
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv11188
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
