Cases 1 - 10 of 491
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. DaVita Kidney Care Contracting, LLC
as 4:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Jones and Chanel Jones
Defendant:
Davita Kidney Care Contracting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Osvaldo Leon v. Renal Treatment Centers - California, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv02570
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo Leon
Defendant:
Renal Treatment Centers - California, Inc., DaVita Inc. and Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Mast Enterprises, LLC et al v. Total Renal Care, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00082
Defendant:
DaVita, Inc., Total Renal Care, Inc., Renal Life Link, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mast Enterprises, LLC and Star Plus, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Lightner v. DaVita, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03104
Plaintiff:
Anduin Lightner
Defendant:
DaVita, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Meyers et al v. Renal Treatment Centers-Southeast, LP et al
as 1:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Katharina Meyer, Alabma Kidney Care, Inc. and Katharina Meyers
Defendant:
Renal Treatment Centers-Southeast, LP, Davita, Inc., Arif Muhammad Yusufi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
