Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Waters v. Day & Zimmermann NPS, Inc.
as 20-1997
Defendant / Appellant:
DAY & ZIMMERMANN NPS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN WATERS, individually and for others similarly situated
Goforth v. Tennessee Valley Authority et al
as 1:2020cv00254
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Goforth
Defendant:
Day & Zimmermann NPS, Inc. and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Ronald King, et al v. UA Local 91, et al
as 20-90016
Respondent:
UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF THE PLUMBING AND PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA, UNION OF PLUMBERS, FITTERS, WELDERS AND SERVICE TECHNICIANS, DAY & ZIMMERMANN NPS, INC., UNITED ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBERS, STEAMFITTERS, WELDERS AND HVAC TECHNICIANS and others
Petitioner:
BRIAN STRUGGS, CHRIS SAMUEL, RONALD KING and others
In Re: Waters
as 20-1487
Respondent:
DAY & ZIMMERMANN NPS, INC. and UNITED STATES
Petitioner:
JOHN WATERS
Waters v. Day & Zimmermann NPS, Inc.
as 1:2019cv11585
Plaintiff:
John Waters
Defendant:
Day & Zimmermann NPS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
