Cases 1 - 10 of 74
SMALLWOOD et al v. U HOOK IT WE PULL IT et al
as 5:2026cv00296
Plaintiff:
AMY MARIE SMALLWOOD and AMY MARIE BOWLING
Defendant:
U HOOK IT WE PULL IT, KEVIN DEWAYNE DAVIS and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Booker v. Davis et al
as 1:2025cv05282
Plaintiff:
Gregory Booker
Defendant:
Det. DeWayne Davis, City Of Chicago and Cook County
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USA
as 3:2024cv00488
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Anthony Dewayne Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Davis v. USA
as 4:2022cv01000
Petitioner:
Khayree Dewayne Davis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Marvin Davis v. Coastal SP Warden, et al
as 22-13633
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARVIN DEWAYNE DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
COASTAL SP WARDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN OF CARE & TREATMENT and CYNTHIA RIVERS
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv57008
Plaintiff:
STEVE DEWAYNE DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03557
Plaintiff:
JOEL DEWAYNE DAVIS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Benson et al
as 4:2020cv00231
Plaintiff:
Marvin Dewayne Davis
Defendant:
Warden Benson, Head Counselor Cynthia Rivers and Deputy Warden Betterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv45195
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEWAYNE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
