Cases 31 - 40 of 79
JOHNSON v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2019cv03863
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DEWAYNE JOHNSON, II
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Johnson v. David Snow, et al
as 19-17063
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSHUA R. MESQITA, Phoenix Gang Unit Detective South Mountain Precinct, JACOB BROWN, BRIAN KAISER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DYWANE JOHNSON, AKA Michael Dewayne Johnson
Antonyo Johnson v. United States
as 19-2947
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Antonyo Dewayne Johnson
Johnson v. USA
as 0:2019cv02478
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Antonyo Dewayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson, Shane v. Marske, Matthew
as 3:2019cv00673
Petitioner:
Shane Dewayne Johnson
Respondent:
Matthew Marske
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Snow et al
as 2:2019cv04802
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Johnson and Michael Dywane Johnson
Defendant:
Brian Kaiser, Joan M Sinclair, Paul Vollmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00588
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Alfonzo Dewayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv09575
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Johnson, II
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
JOHNSON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv04384
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
ROGER DEWAYNE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. People of the State of Michigan
as 1:2018cv00551
Petitioner:
Shane Dewayne Johnson
Respondent:
People of the State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
