Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Meranelli v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2022cv00946
Plaintiff:
Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli and Eric Sorenson
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James et al v. Invasix Inc
as 3:2018cv03285
Plaintiff:
Debbie James and Katlynn Clinich
Defendant:
Invasix, Inc. and Invasix Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
James et al v. Montes et al
as 3:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
Debbie James, Le'Var James and Shaylor James
Defendant:
Jose Barron Montes, Red Rock Risk Retention Group, Inc. and Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
James v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
Debbie James
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
James et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv08122
Plaintiff:
Debbie James and Wesley James
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Folson v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv01137
Plaintiff:
Al Folson
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Govenor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warbington v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00372
Plaintiff:
James E. Warbington
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Desjarlais v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00349
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Robert Desjarlais
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Governor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00348
Plaintiff:
Larry Evans
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Govenor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosby v. Swanson et al
as 0:2012cv00320
Plaintiff:
William Mosby
Defendant:
Lori Swanson, Govenor Dayton, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
