Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Patrick v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv12284
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Patrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consol_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BALL et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, et al.
as 2:2013cv05818
Plaintiff:
MELISSA BALL , ZEDDRA BAYLEY , RUBY CROTTS and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ball et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03053
Plaintiff:
Melissa Ball , Zeddra Bayley , Ruby Crotts and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ball et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as CAN/4:13-cv-03053
Plaintiff:
Melissa Ball , Zeddra Bayley , Ruby Crotts and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Graciela Cortez v. Deborah Patrick
as 12-55369
Petitioner - Appellant:
GRACIELA A. CORTEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH PATRICK
Cortez v. Patrick
as 8:2008cv01020
Petitioner:
Graciela A. Cortez
Respondent:
Deborah Patrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
