Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Jacob-Thomas v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02573
Plaintiff:
Debra Jacob-Thomas
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00209
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2018cv02013
Plaintiff:
Debra E Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2017cv00541
Plaintiff:
Debra L. Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv02653
Plaintiff:
Debra E Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Montana Environmental Info. v. Debra Thomas, et al
as 16-71933
Petitioner:
MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER
Respondent:
DEBRA H. THOMAS, in her capacity as Acting Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8 and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Respondent-Intervenor:
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and TALEN MONTANA, LLC
Archer Daniels Midland Company v. Thomas Calvin et al
as 2:2015cv02141
Plaintiff:
Archer Daniels Midland Company
Defendant:
Debra Yvonne Thomas-Calvin and Deborah James Larry Calvin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Thomas v. USA
as 2:2014cv07344
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Debra L. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2014cv00383
Plaintiff:
Debra E Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
