Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Judson Witham v. US
as 21-2071
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUDSON WITHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TERRENCE W. BOYLE, INTERNATIONAL PAPER AND POWER INC. and others
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv01383
Defendant:
John Thents, Mr. Brenichre, Carl Thume and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Witham v. Boyle et al
as 5:2020cv00446
Defendant:
The GSA, New York State, State of Vermont and others
Plaintiff:
Judson Witham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Witham v. United States Government et al
as 5:2020cv00385
Plaintiff:
Judson Witham
Defendant:
International Paper and Power Inc., 1 - 10 (Bivens Action), Basil Seggos and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Judson Witham v. DEC New York State
as 17-1791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUDSON WITHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
DEC NEW YORK STATE, STATE OF NEW YORK, ANDREW M. CUOMO, Governor and others
Witham v. DEC New York State et al
as 5:2017cv00171
Plaintiff:
Judson Witham
Defendant:
DEC New York State, State of New York, Andrew Cuomo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Christopher Odom v. State of South Carolina
as 16-2121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, JASON KING, Public Defender, CHARLES PATRICK, Solicitor and others
Harding v. Rubenstein et al
as 1:2016cv00173
Plaintiff:
Smitty Harding
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Karen Pszczolkowski, Cecelia Janiszewski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lachkovich v. Bush et al
as 1:2011cv00741
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Lachkovich
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Mark Sullivan, Richard Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Lachkovich v. Bush et al
as 1:2010cv01226
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Lachkovich
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Mark Sullivan, Richard Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
