Cases 31 - 40 of 89
DAVIS v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. et al
as PAE/2:20-CV-02207
Plaintiff:
DAVIS and DENISE DAVIS
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICAL, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Davis v. Tatum et al
as 2:2020cv00100
Defendant:
Julie Yeargin, Doctor Monummed, Murry Tatum and others
Plaintiff:
Tameka Denise Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00204
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00205
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Salu v. Miranda
as 20-761
Defendant / Appellee:
David Molik, Denise Miranda, Louis P. Renzi and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gerard M. Lynch and Rotimi Salu
Defendant:
Denise Davis and Diamond Healthcare Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00127
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
DAVIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2020cv01498
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
DENISE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00079
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00078
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Davies et al v. Raymours Furniture Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv11669
Defendant:
Raymours Furniture Company, Inc., Neil Goldberg and Steven Goldberg
Plaintiff:
Denise Davies and Colleen Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
