Cases
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Mitchell et al v. Suffolk County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv04636
Petitioner: Darryl Mitchell and Denise Mitchell
Respondent: Nassau County and Suffolk County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paselk v. State of Texas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00754
Plaintiff: Carol Paselk
Defendant: State of Texas, Hopkins County Texas, Hopkins County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Cirineo (Diaz-Burgos)
as 12-3472
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Rafael Cirineo, AKA Nano, Norman Alan Sheppard, Franklin Lama and others
Defendant - Appellant: Luis Geraldo Diaz-Burgos, AKA Rafalito
United States of America v. Cirineo
as 12-1235
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Rafael Cirineo, AKA Nano, Norman Alan Sheppard, Franklin Lama and others
Defendant - Appellant: Efrain Nicolas Cirineo, AKA Colas
Mitchell v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 1:2011dp20696
Plaintiff: Denise Mitchell
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Depuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Bard Access Systems We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00425
Plaintiff: Denise Mitchell
Defendant: Bard Access Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Suffolk County, et al
as 2:2011cv00658
Defendant: Jane Doe, John Doe, Richard Dormer and others
Plaintiff: Darryl Mitchell and Denise Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell et al v. Disaster Restoration & Consultants, Inc.
as 2:2008cv03989
Plaintiff: James Mitchell, James Mitchell, Denise Mitchell and others
Defendant: Disaster Restoration & Consultants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?