Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Anthony Wright v. USA, et al
as 14-60848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY WRIGHT, For and on Behalf of His Wife, Stacey Denise Scott Wright, Deceased, and on Behalf of all Wrongful Death Beneficiaries
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and RAND BEERS
Scott v. Pan Nails and Spa, LLC et al
as 5:2014cv00533
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Denise Scott
Defendant:
Pan Nails and Spa, LLC, Van Anh Phan, Kiem Phan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
PAULSBORO DERAILMENT CASES
as 1:2013cv00784
Plaintiff:
DONALD WILSON , MISHON WILSON , ALVERA BLANDING ROBINSON and others
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION , NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY , CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KIDD et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL et al
as 1:2013cv00208
Plaintiff:
TONYA KIDD , HELEN KIDD , DENISE SCOTT and others
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION , NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY , CSX CORPORATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
SCOTT v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv00353
Plaintiff:
DENISE SCOTT
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00759
Plaintiff:
Denise Scott
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Yolanda Scott
as 10-14055
Plaintiff - Appellee:
USA
Defendant - Appellant:
YOLANDA DENISE SCOTT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
