Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Murray v. Universal Protection Service, LLC
as 1:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
Dennis Murray
Defendant:
Universal Protection Service, LLC doing business as Allied Universal Security Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Murray v. Smith
as 1:2020cv00088
Respondent:
Amiee Smith and Aimee Smith
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Marion Dennis Murray, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crapo v. Davie Police Department et al
as 0:2019cv63175
Defendant:
Davie Police Department, Kenny Fernandez and Dennis Murray
Plaintiff:
Adam Scott Crapo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. IBA Proton Therapy, Inc.
as 5:2018cv10681
Plaintiff:
Dennis Murray
Defendant:
IBA Proton Therapy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MURRAY v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
MARION DENNIS MURRAY
Defendant:
GLEN JOHNSON, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CHIEF STAFF COUNSEL OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURRAY v. HEAD et al
as 1:2017cv01117
Plaintiff:
MARION DENNIS MURRAY
Defendant:
FREDRICK J. HEAD, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURRAY v. HEAD et al
as 1:2017cv01102
Plaintiff:
MARION DENNIS MURRAY
Defendant:
FREDRICK HEAD, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, CHIEF OF STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Perez, et al vs. Soldiers of the Cross, et al
as 5:2017cv05014
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Soldiers of the Cross and Dennis Murray
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
Clayton v. Murray, et al
as 6:2016cv00143
Plaintiff:
Ernest Clayton
Defendant:
Dennis Murray, Emmitt Donahue, Brian Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Head et al
as 4:2016cv00058
Plaintiff:
Marion Dennis Murray
Defendant:
Frederick J. Head and Barrick H. Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
