Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Perry v. Avery et al
as 3:2024cv50119
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Mr. Avery, Karen Smiddy, Mr. Bungard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Peeples, et al v. Rachael Campbell, et al
as 24-1342
Plaintiff:
James Peeples and Tasiah Lee
Defendant:
Rachael Campbell, David McCormick, Judge, James Dunham and others
Quizel Welsh v. United States, et al
as 24-1003
Plaintiff:
Quizel Welsh, "I Am That I Am"
Defendant:
United States of America, Ghan & Cooper Commercial Properties, Kathleen Caldarrera, Partner and others
Peeples et al v. Campbell et al
as 4:2023cv01198
Plaintiff:
James Peeples and Tasiah Lee
Defendant:
Rachel Campbell, David McCormick, James Dunham and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Marcus Watson v. D. Sward, et al
as 23-2636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS K. WATSON
Defendant / Appellee:
D. SWARD, Correctional Officer, Z. DENNISTON, Lieutenant, THOMAS BERGAMI, Warden, Warden and others
Welsh v. USA et al
as 4:2023cv00712
Defendant:
Meta, USA, Ghan & Cooper Commercial Properties and others
Plaintiff:
Quizel Welsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Watson v. Sward et al
as 3:2023cv50051
Plaintiff:
Marcus Kalani Watson
Defendant:
D. Sward, Z. Denniston, Bergami and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNISTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02197
Plaintiff:
KYLE DENNISTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Denniston v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv06503
Plaintiff:
Maura Denniston
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dobbs v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2022cv50258
Plaintiff:
John C. Dobbs
Defendant:
Gonzales, J. Leonowicz, Stuer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
