Cases 41 - 50 of 263
Livingston v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv01722
Defendant:
Jennifer Sachse, Charlie Baker, Kelly Casey and others
Plaintiff:
Berry L. Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01353
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04199
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hudson v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2020cv02170
Plaintiff:
Jose Montrell Hudson
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Atty General Keith Ellison, Commissioner of Minnesota Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv06133
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Harris v. Gibson et al
as 4:2020cv01153
Defendant:
Michael Richardson, James Gibson, Arkansas Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Tangela Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Helm et al v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv01008
Plaintiff:
Jacob Curtis Allen Helm and True Vision Tattoos and Fine Arts LLC
Defendant:
Wendy Lyons, Hillcrest Mental Health Center, Lauri Waldbillig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. State of Missouri Department of Corrections/Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 6:2019cv03349
Plaintiff:
Nathan E. Powers
Defendant:
Travis Fleetwood and State of Missouri Department of Corrections/Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00693
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Apel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv00054
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Apel
Defendant:
Amy Neale, Pike County Commission, Chris Gamm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
