Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv12016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Howell v. Massachusetts Attorney General, et al
as 22-1600
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS HOWELL and CURTIS L. HOWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH SERVICES and others
Defendant:
LOWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT, PANERA BREAD CO, BILLERICA HOUSE OF CORRECTION and others
Howell v. Massachusetts Attorney General, et al
as 22-1475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS HOWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LOWELL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant:
BILLERICA HOUSE OF CORRECTION and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Howell v. Massachusetts Attorneys General et al
as 1:2021cv11979
Plaintiff:
Curtis Howell
Defendant:
Massachusetts Attorneys General, Department of Justice, Lowell Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brown v. Bell et al
as 3:2021cv00119
Defendant:
Randolph County Sheriff's Department, Brandon Harper, Pocahontas Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie L Brown, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05935
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
