Cases 31 - 40 of 358
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-35510
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
King v. Wormuth et al
as 3:2023cv05584
Plaintiff:
Theodore E King
Defendant:
Christine Wormuth and United States Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-12031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gregory v. Department of the Army United States Army Cadet Command et al
as 1:2023cv01722
Plaintiff:
Carissa N. Gregory
Defendant:
Department of the Army United States Army Cadet Command, Michael G. Mourouzis, Donyeill A. Mozer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
(PS) Boudousquie v. US Department of the Army et al
as 2:2023cv00948
Plaintiff:
Louis Joseph Boudousquie
Defendant:
US Department of the Army and US Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Buchanan v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Rickey Buchanan
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of the Army, Department of the Air Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SAMPSON v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2023cv01373
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE C. SAMPSON, SR.
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY and DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1543
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
