Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Li v. Connecticut
as 22-2863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dongmei Li
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Connecticut, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs, Connecticut and others
Li v. State of Connecticut
as 22-1980
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dongmei Li
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Connecticut, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs, Connecticut and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Li v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2021cv00996
Plaintiff:
Dongmei Li
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence v. State of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2020cv00862
Defendant:
Denver Dept. of Public Health and Environment, The, Michael Hancock, Colorado Dept. of Public Health and Environment, The and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Public Health et al
as 3:2018cv01482
Plaintiff:
Beverly Jackson
Defendant:
Raul Pino, Dept of Public Health and Adrienne Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Biggins v. Minner et al
as 1:2017cv01739
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Matt Denn, Perry Phelps, Delaware Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Malloy et al
as 3:2017cv01740
Plaintiff:
Loretta J. Davis
Defendant:
Dannel Malloy, Dept of Public Health, Gary Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
