Cases 1 - 10 of 649
Derrick McRae v. Eddie Buffaloe
as 24-6350
Petitioner:
DERRICK JOVAN MCRAE
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., Secretary, N.C. Department of Public Safety
Smith, Jr. v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LETTERLOUGH v. NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00284
Petitioner:
DERRICK DERRAIL LETTERLOUGH
Respondent:
NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Letterlough v. North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02072
Petitioner:
Derrick Derrail Letterlough
Respondent:
North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fishburne v. Lavern Cohen
as 0:2024cv01210
Petitioner:
Derrick Fishburne
Respondent:
Lavern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sofia Cano v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6200
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DR. CHRIS KUNKLE and others
Henderson v. Prisma Health Hospital
as 9:2024cv01068
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Derrick Henderson
Defendant:
Prisma Health Hospital and South Carolina Department Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LINDSEY EL BEY v. CLODFELTER
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
DERRICK JERVON LINDSAY EL BEY
Defendant:
District Attorney T. Lynn Clodfelter and STANLY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
DERRICK DASHAWN BROWN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Meek-Freeman v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
King Nobelmind Meek-Freeman and Derrick LaMonte Carroll
Defendant:
Gov. Wes Moore, Commissioner of Department of Corrections for Maryland, Warden Jeff Nines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
