Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Derrick Cooper v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv10346
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cooper
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department LASD and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Derrick Cooper v. Township of Ridley, et al
as 23-1372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK COOPER
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF RIDLEY, PENNSYLVANIA POLICE OFFICERS, ADMINISTRATORS RIDLEY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHARLES A. POLO, JR., a/k/a CHARLES A. POLO, JR
Cooper v. Porras et al
as 4:2021cv00124
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cooper
Defendant:
Edwin Porras, Sysco Corporation and The Sygma Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22545
Plaintiff:
DERRICK COOPER
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER v. TOWNSHIP OF RIDLEY, PENNSYLVANIA POLICE OFFICERS et al
as 2:2019cv05176
Plaintiff:
DERRICK COOPER
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF RIDLEY, PENNSYLVANIA POLICE OFFICERS, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE, RICHARD ROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Integrity Asset Partners
as 5:2017cv00856
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cooper
Defendant:
Integrity Asset Partners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Derrick Cooper
as 15-51189
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DERRICK DEWAYNE COOPER, also known as Red, also known as Derrick Cooper
Derrick Cooper v. USA
as 15-12363
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK COOPER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cooper v. Leathem
as 2:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cooper
Defendant:
Leathem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv14429
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cooper
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
