Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Thoma v. Smith et al
as 2:2026cv02631
Plaintiff:
Corbett J Thoma
Defendant:
Margaret Smith, Dexter Jones, Jordan Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali-Reynoso et al v. Yugrakh
as 1:2024cv06090
Plaintiff:
DEXTER JONES, BRETT WEINSTEIN, ALEX WILKINS and others
Defendant:
LEON YUGRAKH and Anchor & Canvas Solutions, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Burke v. Payne et al
as 9:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
James Alan Burke, Jr.
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones, Bobby v. Murphy, Donna et al
as 3:2023cv00868
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dexter Jones
Defendant:
Donna Murphy, Nicholas Klimpke, Jason King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Payne et al
as 9:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scot Taylor
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Payne et al
as 1:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scot Taylor
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Payne et al
as 1:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
David Allen Jones
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams et al v. Payne et al
as 1:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniel Adams, Christopher Scot Taylor, David Allen Jones and others
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson et al v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv03050
Plaintiff:
Cyanco Nicholi Stinson, Samuel Vinnie, Raheem Reason and others
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail and Employees of Fulton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
