Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Gladson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Diana Marie Gladson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
John Doe v. Cook et al
as 1:2023cv10362
Defendant:
Aziz Beladel, Jay, Lindsay Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Adnane Touzami and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lawton v. BP Expl & Prod
as 23-30541
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Diana Marie Lawton
Defendant / Appellee:
BP Exploration & Production, Incorporated, BP America Production Company, BP, P.L.C. and others
CLAUS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22132
Plaintiff:
DIANA MARIE LEREA CLAUS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martinez et al v. Auto Company XIV Incorporated
as 2:2022cv01879
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Martinez and Diana Marie Crothers
Defendant:
Auto Company XIV Incorporated a Delaware corporation doing business as AutoNation Hyundai Tempe
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
GUTMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03976
Plaintiff:
DIANA MARIE GUTMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McDougall v. Carusone et al
as 3:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Diana Marie McDougall and Diane Marie McDougall
Defendant:
Fausto Carusone, Jessica Braus, Daniel Glass and others
Nordin v. Scott et al
as 3:2021cv04717
Defendant:
Warn Ford Iverson, Stuart Jeremiah Scott, Travis Hayes Whitfield and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Nicholas Nordin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00034
Plaintiff:
Diana Marie Williams
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Diana Marie Navarro v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2020cv02311
Plaintiff:
Diana Marie Navarro
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
