Cases 41 - 50 of 1,020
Diaz v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv01614
Petitioner:
Jason Diaz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricardo Diaz v. Doerer et al
as 2:2023cv02716
Petitioner:
Ricardo Diaz
Respondent:
Doerer and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Diaz-Cordenas v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Hector Diaz-Cordenas
Respondent:
United States of America and FMC-Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Diaz v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01449
Petitioner:
Felipe Polanco Diaz
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hamett Diaz v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-1490
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAMETT DIAZ
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI
(HC) Diaz v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00412
Petitioner:
Felipe Polanco Diaz
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Britt Dunn et al v. Navid Souferzadeh
as 2:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Britt Dunn, Kenzo Tokuda, Julio Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Navid Souferzadeh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Diaz v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00156
Petitioner:
John J. Sanchez Diaz
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Garcia v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00153
Petitioner:
Dante Diaz Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Warden LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Diaz v. Warden
as 9:2023cv00250
Petitioner:
Abel Diaz
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
