Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thomas v. Woodruff et al
as 3:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Thomas
Defendant:
Sheriff James Woodruff, Troup Co. Sheriff Dept, Dietian Donna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez Burtton v. Livingston County Jail
as 1:2022cv01114
Plaintiff:
Trevor Chavez Burtton
Defendant:
Livingston County Jail, . Burns, . Draper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Grandlienard et al
as 0:2015cv01905
Plaintiff:
Paris Da'Jon Allen
Defendant:
Kent Grandlienard, David Reishus, Tammy Wherley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Delitz et al
as 1:2014cv03438
Plaintiff:
Victor Patterson
Defendant:
LT. Delitz, Supt. Eberhart, Commander Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Medical Staff, et al
as 2:2012cv00325
Petitioner:
Delbert Williams
Respondent:
Medical Staff and Dietian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Gibson v. U.S. DC Sacramento
as 10-72807
:
In re: ROBERT D. GIBSON
Petitioner:
ROBERT D. GIBSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, J. CLARK KELSO, TRACE O'MAIORINO and others
Marshall v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2009cv01389
Plaintiff:
Lamire Marshall
Defendant:
Joseph M. Arpaio, Valesquez, Dietian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Chief Medical Officer of California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv00230
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Gibson
Defendant:
Chief Medical Officer of California Department of Corrections, J. Clark Kelso, Trace O'Maiorino and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peterson et al v. Handel et al
as 5:2008cv00442
Plaintiff:
James Peterson
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, Karen Handel, James Donald and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
