Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Dingess et al v. The Sygma Network, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dingess and Tiffany Dingess
Defendant:
The Sygma Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Frank Morgan v. J. Tincher
as 21-2060
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
J. D. TINCHER, individually and in his official capacity and OFFICER KEVIN CONLEY, individually and in his official capacity
Defendant:
LOGAN COUNTY COMMISSION, A West Virginia county government, LOGAN COUNTY SHERIFF SONYA M. DINGESS-PORTER, individually and in her official capacity, DEPUTY BARRY MYNES, individually and in his official capacity and others
Johnson v. Daniels et al
as 2:2021cv00285
Plaintiff:
Linda Johnson
Defendant:
M. A. Dingess and C. T. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peppers v. Armel et al
as 5:2019cv00327
Defendant:
Davis, Sapp, Pollocl and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Peppers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peppers v. Myers et al
as 3:2019cv00189
Defendant:
DHO Officer D. Huff, Amy Armel, Officer Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Peppers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morgan v. Logan County Commission et al
as 2:2018cv01450
Defendant:
Officer J. D. Tincher, Logan County Sheriff Sonya M. Dingess-Porter, Logan County Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dingess v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11228
Plaintiff:
Debbie C. Dingess
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dingess v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07838
Plaintiff:
Lois Dingess
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dingess v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv02474
Petitioner:
David Lee Dingess, Jr.
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dingess v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv03886
Plaintiff:
Brenda Dingess
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
