Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Graham (Hendrix)
as 24-2167
Defendant:
Chuck, SHARON THOMPSON, Teddy and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Barnes v. DSS et al
as 3:2018cv01567
Plaintiff:
Monique Barnes
Defendant:
DSS, Tina Kirfler, Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United States of America v. Graham (Sullivan)
as 18-1418
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeffrey Graham, AKA Twenty, Rueben Fears, AKA Jay, Derrick Patterson, AKA Dinky, AKA Post and others
Defendant - Appellant:
James Sullivan
Bays Electric, Incorporated, et al v. NECA-IBEW Pension Trust Fund, et al
as 12-8001
Petitioner:
BAYS ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED, PREMIER ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED, and their successors in interest, DINKI ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED and others
Respondent:
NECA-IBEW PENSION TRUST FUND, NECA-IBEW WELFARE TRUST FUND and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRIC WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO. 725
BUCKSHAW v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2010mc00249
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, ATLANTIC CITY AND PRINCETON BOROUGH LAW DEPARTMENTS, UNIVERSITY OF PRINCETON- OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL and others
BUCKSHAW v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2010mc00246
Plaintiff:
JOHN J BUCKSHAW
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, ATLANTIC CITY MUNICIPAL COURT, PRINCETON BOROUGH and others
Benetton U.S.A. Corporation v. Dinky, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00106
Plaintiff:
Benetton U.S.A. Corporation
Defendant:
Dinky, Inc. and Elaine Kostopulos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dominguez v. Fischer et al
as 9:2008cv00360
Plaintiff:
Steven Dominguez
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Lucient LeClaire, Lester Wright and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2006cv06356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
