Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Scotto v. European Banking Authority et al
as 1:2018cv07563
Defendant:
Department of Social Security Administration, European Banking Authority, Microsoft and others
Plaintiff:
Livia Mary Scotto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Direct Express Comerica Bank et al
as 1:2017cv06204
Defendant:
Tom Anatacial, Direct Express Comerica Bank, Direct Express Employees and others
Plaintiff:
Veronica E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Arlotta v. Bank of America N.A.
as 17-2964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Paul Arlotta
Defendant - Appellee:
Bank of America N.A., Citizens Bank N.A. and Direct Express, Corporate Office & Headquarters
GARNER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 5:2017mc00005
Plaintiff:
VALENCIA GARNER RESTRICTED - CHECK FILER STATUS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, FEDERAL POLICE, US DIRECT EXPRESS and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
McCoy v. McCoy et al
as 3:2017cv00520
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allen McCoy
Defendant:
Anthony McCoy, Kim Havard and Direct Express
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0041
Woodward v. Mastercard Direct Express et al
as 2:2016cv01110
Plaintiff:
Ronald Michael Woodward
Defendant:
Mastercard Direct Express and Mindy LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arlotta v. Bank of America et al
as 1:2016cv00792
Plaintiff:
James P. Arlotta
Defendant:
Bank of America, Citizens Bank and Direct Express Corporate Office & Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner v. U.S. Attorney et al
as 1:2016mi00076
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Police and others
Plaintiff:
Valencia Garner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Head v. Direct Express Company
as 1:2016cv00885
Petitioner:
Herbert Glenn Head
Respondent:
Direct Express Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
