Cases 1 - 10 of 551
Carlock v. Harper Woods, City of et al
as 2:2024cv11122
Plaintiff:
James Carlock
Defendant:
City of Harper Woods, Glen Heaney, Matthew Closurdo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rickey Benson v. Sheryl Lipman
as 24-5381
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
SHERYL H. LIPMAN, Chief U.S. District Court Judge
Bibb v. The U.S. District Court Judge Edmund J. Sargus's Court
as 2:2024cv01808
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Bibb
Defendant:
The U.S. District Court Judge Edmund J. Sargus's Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
McGore v. US District Court Judges et al
as 2:2024cv10890
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore
Defendant:
US District Court Judges, Denise Hood, US Supreme Court Justices and others
Pettus v. White et al
as 5:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Alan Michael Pettus
Defendant:
Brent White, Sam Adams, Seth P'pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaber v. 35th District Court et al
as 2:2024cv10790
Plaintiff:
Sundus Jaber
Defendant:
35th District Court, Regional Managed Assigned Counsel Office, Ronald W Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Frederick Stampone v. Michigan Supreme Court, et al
as 24-1252
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK STAMPONE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT, Official and or personal capacity, JULIE CLEMENT, Clerk, official and or personal capacity, MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS, Official and personal capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Salas De La Miya v. Branch County 3-A District Court et al
as 1:2024cv00287
Petitioner:
Kerry Salas De La Miya #1550200
Respondent:
Branch County 3-A District Court and Branch County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
