Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Thompson v. Diversey, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Brandon Thompson
Defendant:
Diversey, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
SC Johnson & Son Inc v. Diversey Inc
as 2:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
SC Johnson & Son Inc
Defendant:
Diversey Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hayward v. The Matworks Co LLC et al
as 1:2020cv07183
Plaintiff:
John Hayward
Defendant:
Diversey Inc and The Matworks Co LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medline industries Inc v. Diversey Inc et al
as 2:2020cv01579
Defendant:
Peter Melchior, Diversey Inc. and Diversey Inc
Plaintiff:
Medline industries Inc
Interested Party:
Wypetech, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slone v. Diversey, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00342
Plaintiff:
Billy N. Slone
Defendant:
Diversey, Inc., CSSA General Insurance Company doing business as AAA Insurance Company and Gregory K. Hampton
Cross Claimant:
CSSA General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Medline Industries, Inc. v. Diversey, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04424
Plaintiff:
Medline Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Diversey, Inc. and Wypetech, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell et al v. Willis et al
as 2:2020cv00229
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Powell and Fredric Powell
Defendant:
Todd Willis and Diversey, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Diversey, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00284
Defendant:
Diversey, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Erik Lee Morris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lois Romero v. Wal-Mart, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00082
Defendant:
Tarkett U.S.A., Inc., Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Wal-Mart, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lois Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Esquivel v. Diversey, Inc.
as 1:2019cv05423
Plaintiff:
David Esquivel
Defendant:
Diversey, Inc., Paul Budsworth and Twister Cleaning Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
