Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Watkins v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv01467
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, OSP Doctor Harris, WCCF Doctor Graham and others
Plaintiff:
James Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADISON v. BERRY et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MADISON
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, MR CLARK, MR GARDENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Betty Smith v. HPR Clinic, LLC, et al
as 20-3573
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BETTY E. SMITH, in her capacity as attorney-in-fact for Dr. Paul C. Smith, individually and on behalf of the ERISA-covered plan
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR RYAN FRYMAN, DOCTOR HARRY NGUYEN and HPR CLINIC, LLC
Concepcion v. Valdes et al
as 3:2019cv00410
Defendant:
MTC Medical, Doctor Harris, Putnam County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Concepcion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taggart v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv00666
Plaintiff:
Tara Taggart
Defendant:
City of New York , New York City Correctional Officer Castillo, New York City Correctional Captain Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jehovah v. Clarke et al
as 1:2017cv01307
Plaintiff:
Jesus Emmanuel Jehovah
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, John M. Jabe, Arnold David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Everette Peeples v. Leon Dixion
as 15-6310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVERETTE L. PEEPLES
Defendant - Appellee:
LEON DIXION, Doctor / N.C.C., DOCTOR EMRAN, DOCTOR / SUSSEX STATE PRISON, DOCTOR HARRIS, DOCTOR / St. Brides C.C. and others
Darrell Witts v. Doctor Harri
as 12-8134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL LEE WITTS
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR HARRIS, Institution Doctor
Darrell Witts v. Dr. Harri
as 12-6697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL LEE WITTS
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR HARRIS, Institution Doctor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-20001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
