Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Crites et al v. Kanawha County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2018cv00415
Plaintiff:
Gary Crites and Hunter Crites
Defendant:
Kanawha County Sheriff's Department , Kanawha County Commission , City of Charleston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock v. Rickard et al
as 1:2018cv00024
Plaintiff:
Gary Warren Hancock, Jr.
Defendant:
Barbara Rickard, Sawyers, Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dzingeleski v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Dzingeleski
Defendant:
Allied Van Lines, Inc. , John Fayard Moving & Warehousing, LLC , John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sayre v. Murphy et al
as 1:2017cv00198
Plaintiff:
Kenny Drew Sayre
Defendant:
John T. Murphy, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04337
Plaintiff:
Catherine Rivera and Victor Rivera
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC , Ethicon, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephens v. Kern et al
as 3:2017cv00952
Plaintiff:
William Henry Stephens, Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Kern, Travis Hagan, Unknown Police Officer John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Officer John Doe 1 et al
as 3:2017cv02520
Plaintiff:
Justin Matthew Wells
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 1 and Officer John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Wilson et al
as 1:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
TyJuan Develle Townsend
Defendant:
L. Wilson, John Doe, (1), John Doe, (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Townsend v. Wilson et al
as 3:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
TyJuan Develle Townsend
Defendant:
L. Wilson, John Doe, 1, John Doe , 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Givens v. John Doe 1 et al
as 5:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Gregory Latrell Givens
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, K. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
