Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Wright v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2018cv00927
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wright
Defendant:
Diane Carmel , Steven Sinclair , Eric Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evin DeVan v. Dennis Frick, et al
as 17-35436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVIN DEVAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS FRICK, FSS, JOHN DOES, I-X and JANE DOES, I-X
Demark v. Harry et al
as 3:2017cv00732
Plaintiff:
Carmen Demark
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, C.O. Miller, C.O. Gault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron Burns v. David Simmon
as 17-6520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON M. BURNS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID SIMMONS, Superintendent, CAPTAIN COWAN, Chief of Security, HRRJ, SERGEANT EPPERSON, Unit Manager, HU 1 and others
Defendant:
JIM O'SULLIVAN, Sheriff, JOHN DOE, Superintendent, SERGEANT ELLIS, Internal Affairs, HRRJ and others
Parks v. Sebastian County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2017cv02047
Plaintiff:
Terry Eugene Parks
Defendant:
Sebastian County, Arkansas , William Hollenbeck , David Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DeVan v. Hiens et al
as 1:2016cv00548
Plaintiff:
Evin DeVan
Defendant:
Hiens, Brown, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Brooks et al
as 1:2016cv00466
Plaintiff:
Chadlen DeWayne Smith
Defendant:
Jakob Brooks, Burns, Schuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeVan v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00419
Plaintiff:
Evin DeVan
Defendant:
Corizon Health Inc. and John and Jane Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fogleman v. Three Rivers Towing et al
as 1:2016cv00186
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shane Fogleman
Defendant:
Three Rivers Towing, John Does I-X and Jerry Allen, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fogleman v. Okaloosa County Pre-Trial Services et al
as 1:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jeremy S. Fogleman
Defendant:
Okaloosa County Pre-Trial Services and John Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
