Cases 41 - 50 of 122
Knight v. Kitchen et al
as 2:2019cv04166
Defendant:
Tom Beckner, Deputy Chad Kerns, Daulton Lowry and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter v. Kelley et al
as 5:2019cv00169
Defendant:
Dunn, Wendy Kelley, Does John/Jane Sergeant and Captain, MSU and others
Plaintiff:
Davis Don Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villa v. FNU et al
as 5:2019cv00192
Plaintiff:
Bert Villa
Defendant:
Nava FNU, Doe John and Sgt. FNU Nava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDougald v. Eddy et al
as 2:2019cv00257
Defendant:
Jane Doe / John Doe, Dr Andrew Eddy and Andrew Eddy
Plaintiff:
Jerome McDougald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaffer v. Bryson et al
as 1:2018cv05459
Defendant:
John Doe, Georgia Department of Corrections, Jane Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Willard Shaffer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Houston County et al
as 9:2018cv00182
Defendant:
DOE JANE, HOUSTON COUNTY, DOE JOHN and others
Plaintiff:
KYLE RAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Martin v. Skeens et al
as 1:2018cv01292
Defendant:
S. Simpson, Jacqueline Lashbrook, Sandra Boechman and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevie Stevenson v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 18-56016
Petitioner:
STEVIE J. STEVENSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, Secretary of CDCR, SCOTT KERNAN, Undersecretary/Secretary of CDCR, SHANNON SWAIN, Acting Superintendent of Education and others
Hilmi Eladem v. Mark Nooth, et al
as 18-35564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HILMI HAMMAD ELADEM
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK NOOTH, CASEY CLEAVER, GULICK, a Doctor at SRCI and others
Marcus Miller v. Doctor Larson, et al
as 18-2347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR LARSON, Big Muddy River CC, DEBBIE ISAACS, Health Care Administrator, Big Muddy River CC, J. DOE, John/Jane 2-9, Nurse, Big Muddy River CC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
