Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Kinder et al v. State of Colorado et al
as 2:2017cv01007
Plaintiff:
Ruben W Kinder and Patrick Quinteros
Defendant:
State of Colorado, John Hickenlooper, Gordon P. Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bramscher v. Qucik et al
as 1:2015cv00257
Plaintiff:
William Robert Bramscher
Defendant:
Don (I) Quick, Don Quick, Daniel (I) Thomas Brechbuhl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Penrod v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2014cv02329
Plaintiff:
Donald Adam Penrod
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, John Suthers, Paul Koehler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sigler v. Cooper, Tanis and Cohen PC, et al
as 1:2012cv03198
Plaintiff:
Curt Allen Sigler
Defendant:
Cooper, Tanis and Cohen PC, H Patrick Furman, Dale Hammell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo, v. Hickenlooper, et al.,
as 1:2012cv02034
Plaintiff:
Alfonso A. Carrillo, Augustin Telles, Raymundo Castillo and others
Defendant:
John W. Hickenlooper, John W. Sutters, Elizabeth Oldham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Penrod v. Quick, et al
as 12-1163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD ADAM PENROD
Defendant - Appellee:
DON QUICK, Adams County D.A., SUSAN JONES, Warden CSP, TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Penrod v. Suthers et al
as 1:2012cv00592
Plaintiff:
Donald Adam Penrod
Defendant:
John Suthers, Clemmie Parker Engle, Don Quick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penrod v. Quick et al
as 1:2011cv03273
Plaintiff:
Donald Adam Penrod
Defendant:
Don Quick, Susan Jones and Tom Clements
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Penrod v. Don Quick
as 11-6967
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD ADAM PENROD
Respondent - Appellee:
DON QUICK, Adams County District Attorney and CAROL CHAMBERS, Arapahoe County District Attorney
Penrod v. Quick et al
as 5:2011hc02012
Petitioner:
Donald Adam Penrod
Respondent:
Don Quick and Carol Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
