Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Abrahams et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11519
Plaintiff:
Peter Cullen, Duwayne Tinsley, Joseph Cerrato and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Lynch, M.D. v. Giglia, M.D. et al
as 1:2017cv00770
Plaintiff:
Donald Lynch, M.D.
Defendant:
Joseph Giglia, M.D., Jonathan Moulton, M.D., George H Meier, III, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LYNCH v. USA
as 4:2016cv00148
Petitioner:
JAMES DONALD LYNCH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LYNCH v. USA
as 4:2016cv00138
Petitioner:
JAMES DONALD LYNCH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin et al v. Burke Engineering Corporation, an Illinois Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv04138
Plaintiff:
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin and General Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Burke Engineering Corporation, an Illinois Corporation, Charlene Earley, Vincent A Abete and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Matthew Donald Maxwell
as 15-11659
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW DONALD LYNCH MAXWELL
USA v. Matthew Donald Maxwell
as 15-11657
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW DONALD LYNCH MAXWELL
Kidd v. Dorothy Nichols Trust et al
as 3:2009cv00779
Plaintiff:
Debra Kidd and Debra Kidd
Defendant:
Dorothy Nichols Trust and Donald Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
LYNCH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2007cv00142
Petitioner:
JAMES DONALD LYNCH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv05275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
